| A new ‘view’ of ecology and conservation through animal-borne video systems Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Volume 22, Issue 12, 1 December 2007, Pages 660-668 Remington J. Moll, Joshua J. Millspaugh, Jeff Beringer, Joel Sartwell and Zhihai He Abstract Over the past three decades, technological advances for monitoring wild animals have expanded the ability of ecologists to study animal behavior and space use. Currently, researchers are deploying animal-borne video and environmental data collection systems (AVEDs), which enable researchers to see what the animal sees in the field. AVEDs record fine-scale movements as well as features of the surrounding environment and thus provide essential context for understanding animal decisions and interactions with other individuals. These fine-scale data are often crucial for understanding potential conservation threats to species of concern. Here, we discuss the development and research potential offered by AVEDs. The benefits of AVEDs are greatest in hypothesis-driven studies that require a fine-scale perspective that other technologies cannot offer. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (791 kb) |
| Route masters Current Biology, Volume 17, Issue 10, 15 May 2007, Pages R343-R344 Nigel Williams Summary A new study reveals that turtles stick closely to previous tracks between breeding and foraging sites, offering new potential to protect these animals at sea. reports. Summary | Full Text | PDF (868 kb) |
| Understanding impacts of fisheries bycatch on marine megafauna Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Volume 19, Issue 11, 1 November 2004, Pages 598-604 Rebecca L. Lewison, Larry B. Crowder, Andrew J. Read and Sloan A. Freeman Abstract Hunting by humans played a major role in extirpating terrestrial megafauna on several continents and megafaunal loss continues today in both terrestrial and marine ecosystems. Recent declines of large marine vertebrates that are of little or no commercial value, such as sea turtles, seabirds and marine mammals, have focused attention on the ecological impacts of incidental take, or bycatch, in global fisheries. In spite of the recognition of the problem of bycatch, few comprehensive assessments of its effects have been conducted. Many vulnerable species live in pelagic habitats, making surveys logistically complex and expensive. Bycatch data are sparse and our understanding of the demography of the affected populations is often rudimentary. These factors, combined with the large spatial scales that pelagic vertebrates and fishing fleets cover, make accurate and timely bycatch assessments difficult. Here, we review the current research that addresses these challenging questions in the face of uncertainty, analytical limitations and mounting conservation crises. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (241 kb) |
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Current Biology, Volume 16, Issue 10, 990-995, 23 May 2006
doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.063
Report
Lucy A. Hawkes1, Annette C. Broderick1, Michael S. Coyne2, Matthew H. Godfrey3, Luis-Felipe Lopez-Jurado4, Pedro Lopez-Suarez4, Sonia Elsy Merino5, Nuria Varo-Cruz4 and Brendan J. Godley1,
, 
1 Marine Turtle Research Group, Centre for Ecology and Conservation, School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn TR10 9EZ, United Kingdom
2 Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University, A321 LSRC, Box 90328, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0328
3 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, 1507 Ann Street, Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
4 Universidad Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Departamento de Biología, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
5 Instituto Nacional de Desenvolvimento das Pescas, C.P. 132, Mindelo, Sao Vicente, Islas de Cabo Verde
Ph: +44 01326 371 861Marine turtles undergo dramatic ontogenic changes in body size and behavior, with the loggerhead sea turtle, Caretta caretta, typically switching from an initial oceanic juvenile stage to one in the neritic, where maturation is reached and breeding migrations are subsequently undertaken every 2–3 years [1,2,3]. Using satellite tracking, we investigated the migratory movements of adult females from one of the world's largest nesting aggregations at Cape Verde, West Africa. In direct contrast with the accepted life-history model for this species [4], results reveal two distinct adult foraging strategies that appear to be linked to body size. The larger turtles (n = 3) foraged in coastal waters, whereas smaller individuals (n = 7) foraged oceanically. The conservation implications of these findings are profound, with the population compartmentalized into habitats that may be differentially impacted by fishery threats in what is a global fishing hotspot [5]. Although the protection of discrete areas containing coastal individuals may be attainable, the more numerous pelagic individuals are widely dispersed with individuals roaming over more than half a million square kilometers. Therefore, mitigation of fisheries by-catch for sea turtles in the east Atlantic will likely require complex and regionally tailored actions to account for this dichotomous behavior.