Copyright © 2002 Cell Press.
Current Biology, Vol 12, 1240-1244, 23 July 2002

Brief communication

Selective Recruitment of TAFs by Yeast Upstream Activating Sequences: Implications for Eukaryotic Promoter Structure

Xiao-Yong Li,2 Sukesh R. Bhaumik, Xiaocun Zhu, Lei Li, Wu-Cheng Shen,3 Bharat L. Dixit, and Michael R. Green

Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Programs in Gene Function and Expression and Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 364 Plantation Street, Worcester, MA 01605 USA

u2217Corresponding author
Michael R. Green
(508) 856-5331 (phone)
(508) 856-5473 (fax)
michael.green@umassmed.edu


Summary


The general transcription factor TFIID is composed of the TATA box binding protein (TBP) and multiple TBP-associated factors (TAFs) [1–3]. In yeast, promoters can be grouped into two classes based on the involvement of TAFs [4, 5]. TAF-dependent (TAFdep) promoters require TAFs for transcription, and TBP and TAFs are present at comparable levels on these promoters. TAF-independent (TAFind) promoters do not require TAFs for activity, and TAFs are either absent or present at levels far below those of TBP on these promoters. Here, we demonstrate that the upstream activating sequence (UAS) mediates the selective recruitment of TAFs to TAFdep promoters. A TAFind UAS fails to recruit TAFs and to direct efficient transcription when inserted upstream of a TAFdep core promoter. This transcriptional defect can be overcome by a potent activator, indicating that a strong activation domain can compensate for the absence of TAFs on a TAFdep core promoter. Our results reveal a requirement for compatibility between the UAS and core promoter and thus help explain previous reports that only certain yeast UAS-core promoter combinations and mammalian enhancer-promoter combinations are efficiently transcribed [6–11]. The differential recruitment of TAFs by UASs provides strong evidence for the proposal that in vivo TAFs are the targets of some, but not all, activators.

Footnotes

2Present address: Sangamo BioSciences, 501 Canal Boulevard, Suite A100, Richmond, California 94804.3Present address: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, WHA Room 4281, Syracuse, New York 13210-2339.

Articles that cite this article

Assembly of a Mediator/TFIID/TFIIA Complex Bypasses the Need for an Activator
Kristina M. Johnson and Michael Carey
Current Biology, 2003, 13:9:772-777
[Summary] [Full Text] [PDF] [Supplemental Data] 
Responses of Four Yeast Genes to Changes in the Transcriptional Machinery Are Determined by Their Promoters
Jason X. Cheng, Monique Floer, Paul Ononaji, Gene Bryant and Mark Ptashne
Current Biology, 2002, 12:21:1828-1832
[Summary] [Full Text] [PDF] 
Transcription Activation: Unveiling the Essential Nature of TFIID
Bo-Shiun Chen and Michael Hampsey
Current Biology, 2002, 12:18:R620-R622
[Summary] [Full Text] [PDF] 
Cellular Stress Alters the Transcriptional Properties of Promoter-Bound Mot1-TBP Complexes
Joseph V. Geisberg and Kevin Struhl
Molecular Cell, 2004, 14:4:479-489
[Summary] [Full Text] [PDF] [Supplemental Data] 
Functional Characterization of Core Promoter Elements: DPE-Specific Transcription Requires the Protein Kinase CK2 and the PC4 Coactivator
Brian A. Lewis, Robert J. Sims, III, William S. Lane and Danny Reinberg
Molecular Cell, 2005, 18:4:471-481
[Summary] [Full Text] [PDF] [Supplemental Data] 

Article Options

Search Medline for

Related Articles

Linked Articles